Perioperative Use of Pituitrin after Cardiac Defect Repair in Adult Patients with Severe Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressin can constrict peripheral arteries without constricting the pulmonary artery. Theoretically, vasopressin is suitable for the perioperative treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Few studies have investigated the use of pituitrin (a substitute for vasopressin) after cardiac defect repair surgery. This study aimed to analyze the effect of pituitrin on hemodynamics and to determine whether pituitrin can be used after surgical repair in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension-congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD). METHODS: A pulmonary artery catheter was used in all the patients for hemodynamic monitoring. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and at 0.5 h, 1 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after pituitrin administration. The changes in the hemodynamic parameters before and after pituitrin use were analyzed through repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with PAH-CHD underwent repair surgery; 23 patients were included in further analysis, including 11 with atrial septal defect, 9 with ventricular septal defect, and 3 with patent ductus arteriosus. Ten (43.5%) were men, with a mean age of 29.4 ± 6.8 years. Hemodynamic parameters before and after the oxygen test were as follows: radial artery oxygen saturation, 91.5% ± 4.4 vs. 97.9 ± 2.4%; pulmonary vascular resistance, 10.5 ± 1.8 Wood units (wu) vs. 5 ± 1.2 wu; systemic-pulmonary blood flow ratio (QP/QS), 1.1 ± 0.2 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9. With prolonged use, the systolic blood pressure of the radial artery increased significantly (P = 0.001), that of the pulmonary artery decreased significantly (P = 0.009), and RP/s decreased significantly (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pituitrin as an alternative to vasopressin can increase arterial pressure, decrease pulmonary artery pressure, and reduce the pulmonary artery pressure/arterial pressure ratio after repair surgery in adult patients with PAH-CHD.

A versatile transapical device for aortic valvular disease: One-year outcomes of a multicenter study on the J-Valve system.

BACKGROUND: The novel J-Valve (JC Medical Inc, Burlingame, CA, USA) was developed to cope with aortic valvular disease by facilitating accurate positioning. We present the first one-year results regarding the safety and efficacy of the J-Valve system implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic regurgitation (AR) undergoing transapical-transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study enrolled 107 high-risk patients (mean age 74.4 ± 5.2 years; mean EuroSCORE-I 11.2 ± 1.2%) with severe AS (n = 64) or AR (n = 43), at the three largest cardiac centers in China. The study was fully monitored, and adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee using Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. RESULTS: The success rate of the procedure was 91.6% (98/107). At 1 year, the all-cause mortality was 5.0%, stroke 2%, and rate of new pacemakers 5.0%. Only mild paravalvular leak was reported. Among the patients with AS, the 1-year follow-up demonstrated a sustainable reduction of mean transaortic gradient from 57.7 ± 15.4 mmHg to 15.5 ± 8.3 mmHg. All patients who completed the follow-up reported improvements in New York Heart Association functional class (n = 93) and health-related quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire index (n = 94). In intergroup comparisons, the 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events-free survival was similar between the groups based on valve disease (AS vs. AR, log-rank p = 0.17) or morphology (tricuspid vs. bicuspid aortic valve, log-rank p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides further evidence on the safety and efficacy of the J-Valve in high-risk patients with AS or AR for surgery.